The decision of the Turkish Constitutional Court regarding dismissal of two of it’s members provokes questions

www.kararlaryeni.anayasa.gov

9th of August 2016 the Turkish constitutional court publicly announced via its website the reasoning of the decision of the permanent removal of its 2 members:

ANAYASA MAHKEMESİ KARARI GENEL KURUL

The decision was made unanimously.

It includes 5 headlines. The most important things are the followings:

1. The court says the emergence law does not require evidence based assessment so belief is sufficient to reach a final decision.
2. There is no evidence mentioned in the decision.
3. There is nothing particular regarding the dismissed members. No event, no proof, no assessment, no evidence.
4. The decision contains more than 10 pages just explaining the law and the attempted coup. So assessment of laws and facts. There is no fact regarding the members. No subsumption.
5. In the conclusion part the rationale is limited to: “the law says that the belief of the plenary of the court is enough. We believe unanimously they have ties with the FETO.“

This provokes questions:

1. On which evidence your belief is based ?
2. How did you find or believe there is a tie between FETO and these court members?
3. Which acts of them made you believe they are close to the FETO?